4 moments that created the modern world

There have been many turning points in human history, at which juncture the whole future of the modern world could have easily changed. Here are four points which helped shape the world we live in, and without which the lives we live today would be very different.

1) Henry VIII divorcing Catherine of Aragon

If you live in the English speaking world chances are you’ve heard of the expression ‘divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived’ at some point, well this little rhyme sums up the fact that Henry was a bit of a lech, as well as highly impatient for a male heir to the throne. Quite why this is such an important event, and why it is number one on this list, is the fact that if Henry had not divorced Catherine, and thus broken with the church of Rome, the likelihood is that England, and by extension Britain, would probably not have risen to become the pre-eminent global power in the 18th and 19th centuries. Chances are the French, Spanish, and potentially the Dutch would all have carved out bigger empires in North America, Africa, and Asia, and English would certainly not have become the language of commerce.
The effect of taking England out of the Pope’s domain essentially brought England to loggerheads with the other Catholic powers in Europe, and over the course of the next 200 years anti-Catholic sentiment drove from the Armada, whose defeat signalled England’s rise as a naval power, then the establishment of the American colonies by protesting puritans, and then finally the crushing of the Catholic French the world over in the war of the Spanish Succession which secured British military might in the 18th Century, just in time for global colonisation to begin. So, thanks to a lecherous monarch, you are able to communicate with pretty much two thirds of the rest of the planet who are native or second language English speakers, not bad for a third generation Welshman.

2) Hitler is rejected by the Vienna Academy of Arts

In around 1908 a struggling Austrian painter living in Vienna was formally rejected by the Academy of Arts in Vienna for a second time, ran out of money, and ended up in a homeless shelter. 37 years and two world wars later this same man was burning in a pit in Berlin, having just shot himself and his new wife. This man of course if Adolf Hitler, and quite how he came to nearly rule the world is one of the ironies of modern history. Much of what we now take for granted in the West was firmly established by the events of the war he provoked in 1939-1945, as the rules of international law, the sweeping away of the old colonial order, and much else besides was set in motion by his desires and predilections. Much has been written about Hitler’s life, and it is more than possible that had he been accepted into the Academy his life would probably have gone in a completely different direction.
While it would be easy to blame the examiners of the Academy for what was to follow, it is worth pointing out that while Hitler was not a bad painter, he lacked the flare they were clearly looking for,  and as such he would have struggled regardless. This is one of those big what if moments in recent history, and while it is very easy to suggest alternatives the fact remains that the conflicts he caused brought the modern world into being, and if they had not happened events like the moon landings, break up of the colonial Empires, rise (and fall) of the Soviets and Americans, as well as a whole host of technological advancements would not have been achieved in the time frame they were. In essence it is fair to assume that had the board accepted Herr Hitler the modern world would have been a very different place.

3) Bill Gates drops out of Harvard

In an age of fame, fashion, and celeb culture, one man came to tower everyone else as the richest man on the planet. Not a prince, not old money, or even a financial whiz kid, rather a bespectacled computer programmer from Seattle rose from obscurity to build one of the leviathans of the modern age Microsoft. Together with his friends Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer Bill Gates created a software company that with a lot of luck, cunning, and business savy was able to come to almost completely dominate the home computing operating system market for nearly 25 years with various incarnations of Windows.  Say what you like about Microsoft, but it is highly arguable that had Bill Gates opted to stay at Harvard in 1977 to finish his studies the modern computing market would be far more fragmented and possibly less accessible to the masses.
The near total dominance of Windows as an operating stems from an agreement Gates signed with IBM in the mid-1980′s which put Microsoft software on all new home computers, thus enabling them to in effect have a reach far beyond any of their competitors. The other personal computers around at the time, like Apples and Atari’s, were unable to compete with the reach of IBM, and almost all of Microsoft’s competitors folded by the mid-1990′s. Of course Microsoft has been heavily fined for anti-trust breaches, but the one major impact they have had on the computer market is to provide the same operating software across nearly the entire market, which has meant software firms only have to worry about one universal operating system when programming. This in turn has kept the relative cost of computing low, though with the advent of Google and Linux the Microsoft dominance is slowly fading. Of course Apple have always been there, but it is fair to say that if Microsoft had not been there from the start of the home computing revolution it is very possible that the cost of computing would have been much higher for a longer period of time, and the implications for the internet would have been that it would have taken far longer for computing to become as easily as accessible as it has. So you can thank a  university drop out from the rain capital of America for enabling you to use the computer in the way you do.

4) The death of Annie Darwin

In 1859 Charles Darwin rocked Britain, and eventually the rest of the world, with the publication of On Origin of Species. In one book he neatly presented the origin of life without the need for a creator, and unleashed the hornets nest of religion v science which has been raging ever since. Probably the one singular event that drove Darwin from his religious roots, and down the path that ultimately gave flesh to the bones of evolutionary theory, was the unfortunate death of his beloved first daughter Annie of scarlet fever in 1851. Her death caused him to have a fundamental rethink of his personal faith, which had already come under scrutiny both from his wife and his experiences about HMS Beagle on his trip round the world in the 1830′s. It was this shift away from the religious, and the opening his mind to the world around him, that allowed him the space to consider the evolutionary principles, and eventually put pen to paper. His rage the creator for the death of his daughter finally brought home to him the futility of religion, and in particular the Christian creed.
Without Darwin evolution would have emerged in some form in the latter half of the 19th century, but it probably would have had a far harder fight on it’s hands without Darwin and his friends fighting the theory’s corner. In many respects the science we know today, has it’s fundamental roots in the ability of scientists to think outside of the religious box, and while bad thinks have been done in the name of evolution, and a theory it has had the most profound and overly positive effect on the modern world by ridding us of the scourge of religious intolerance and arbitrary laws based on tribal customs.

Posted in Social issues | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hornest Nest

In some small way the religious think a prayer can solve the world’s problems, while the atheist scoffs at the empty handed gesture that the words to the void evoke. In a very big way the religious use their faith and creed as a way of moulding the world around them, while the humanist and irreligious seek to analyse, study, and harmonise the world for the betterment of everyone. Then there are those who seek to kick over the hornets nest, play football with it, and unleash the bitter seeds of hatred. Religion and humanism argue the high ground over morality, each arguing the other is the cause of moral decline, social disharmony, and ultimately social failure.

Into the fray steps a whole host of unwitting and unwilling participants – women, homosexuals, animal rights activists, pacifists, liberals, indeed anyone who wants to have the right of personal choice and expression invariably finds themselves in the firing line of this swarm of hornets swirling around society. Throughout history mankind has been at loggerheads over moral superiority, and in the end where has this got us? We still rape, pillage, slaughter, ransack, ignore, and generally feign ignorance over the world around us. For all the pithy arguments that the irreligious put forward or the religious spew forth there still remains the intractable fact that human nature is at it’s very core complex, ego-centric, vein, yet deeply in need of social interaction and a sense of self worth.

A lot of the problems we face today are drawn from this paradox – on the one hand we simply lookout for ourselves, yet on the other hand we all have this craving to belong to the bigger group. Herd mentality explains a lot of the good and evil in the world – you name a man made phenomenon and at it’s heart will be a group effort – and also explains why most of our moral compasses are not black and white, merely shades of grey – stealing is wrong, but you will still download that MP3 is because your friend sent you the link.

The devil’s advocate in me points to the fact that the over-riding reason genocide happens, in all it’s ugly shapes and forms, is because the average Joe in the street is prepared to either turn a blind eye or go along with his neighbour in perpetrating the violence. Hitler’s Germany, Rwanda 1994, Spanish Inquisition, The US government’s force expropriation of Nation American lands, all have the odour of social collusion regardless of creed or political colours. Yes of course there are those who stand up to the herd, but usually they are silenced quickly and brutally. Standing up for the rights of others takes a special sort of courage, and when your flame is snuffed out so easily it becomes far harder to spark that fire in the first place.

So where does that leave us in the modern world? There are plenty of herds pulling in many different directions – gay rights, environmentalism, atheism, liberalism, abolition of nuclear weapons, and many other left field non-conformist ideas all run against the mainstream herds, which makes it harder for those who do hold these viewers to find a voice in the crowd. This is why it is very important that if you do have beliefs about how society should be run then you should allow yourself the freedom to have that voice. No matter how pinned down you may feel, if your viewers run counter to the herd there will be others out there who enjoined will raise the volume so you can be heard.

In 1492 Spain finally conquered Grenada, and the flourishing arts, science, and philosophy of Muslim Iberia died. In it’s place sprung up the Inquisition, and for 470 years Spain was yoked with dogma, social inertia, and an inflexible approach, which caused a steady economic decline which was only arrested with the installation of democracy in the 1970′s, which in turn proved to be open minded about all aspects of society. With this approach Spanish society has flourished, and the rights of all are respected. Post World War Two Germany has the same story to tell – the downfall of those who sought division and hegemony to one social ideal, and replaced with a social ideology that mixed liberalism and socialism in an open and informed manner. This patten has been repeated around the world at many points through history, and while repression of minorities may yield short term results for the societies embarking down this path, the single biggest lesson is actually that when minorities and those who non-mainstream views are allowed to flourish society as a whole flourishes in the long run.

In the end kicking over the hornets nest and challenging the status quo serves society well, as entrenched views often lead to stagnation and the fraying of the social fabric. The atheist has every right to challenge religions when they interfere with the personal lives of society at large, but the religious also have the right to be allowed to worship how they please providing it causes no harm to those around them. If you are a person of faith then you should never be persecuted for your views, but at the same time those views should never be imposed on the rest of society. If everyone accepted the other person’s view as solely a personal perspective, rather than a political mandate to overhaul society, then it would go a long way to eliminating the perpetual cycle of angry hornets trying to sting each other in endless concentric debates. Society exists for all members to be treated equally, and therefore the majority need to allow the minority space to be themselves without fear of the swarm attacking them.

Ultimately to stop the nasty things happening society needs to better understand it’s intrinsic parts, and the only way this will happen is if people take the time to listen to each side of the argument, contemplate it, then react from their own world view. This is the rational approach, and if used will provide a far better solution than barbed stings and angry words. Finally, there is a right and a wrong, but also a whole lot of grey in between – and finding out about these shades makes the debates, discussions, and arguments all worthwhile. If we all took more time to better understand the arguments and philosophies the angry hornets who transform into bees gathering nectar for honey, turning angry words into sweet morsels to ponder and cogitate, and the herd mentality will change into a personal viewpoint.

Posted in Politics, Social issues | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Freya Fox

Model: Freya Fox – Photographers: Rachel Saunders & Joanne Brownridge – Location: City Screen, York

Enchanting, intriguing, and a siren of the stage Freya makes all the boys want to come to her yard when she shows off her moves during her thrilling act. Check out her Facebook page for details of her up coming shows.

Posted in Artist spotlight, Creativity | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Eminem – Love The Way You Lie ft. Rihanna

Simply put: wow! Okay, so I am jumping on the band wagon a week late, but this video is simply spectacular, and the song really makes you think about things. Visually it is a stunning video, and the cinematography is beautifully shot. Lyrically both singers bring their unique talents to the fore, and it is one of those tracks that is well worth repeat viewing.

Posted in Track of the week, music | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

So you think you can walk?


Many us like to think we can walk a fair distance, five miles, ten miles, maybe a cross country walk. Now imagine this – spending 28 months walking from Peru to the coast of Brazil following the course of the Amazon through jungle, swamps, hostile locals, and overwhelming heat. Ed Stafford did just that, sheer unadulterated madness in the same vein as David Livingstone’s trek down the Nile, except he did it with only the aid of his Peruvian guide Gadiel “Cho” Sanchez. This dynamic duo have faced drug dealers, big cats, tangled jungle, and leeches, and yesterday they finished their journey. It is an epic tale, one which stands alongside the sagas of old.

Ranulph Fiennes is probably the closest I can think of to someone who matches Ed’s sheer bloody mindedness, and if you have a few hours spare it is well worth pouring over Ed’s website, photographs, and blog, as his tale is an epic adventure of the boys own variety. It is a deed which will shine through the century as a beacon of triumph over adversity, and will surely inspire many more adventures in the years to come. This tale should give us all a kick up the arse to get out there and explore the world. If there is some corner you fancy exploring Ed’s trek should give you the impetus to do it, so go and do that hike you always wanted to do.

Posted in Social issues, environment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Kakapo

Kakapo

In 1995 there were less that 60 Kakapo left in New Zealand. These beautiful, flightless birds had been driven to the edge of extinction by rats, cats, dogs, and stoats introduced by human settlers in the last 1000 years. Prior to human colonisation of the islands by the Mauri New Zealand was a land of birds, insects, and the odd reptile, all evolving independently from the rest of the world due to continental drift over 70+ millions years. With no natural predators the Kakapo feared no-one and no-thing, only to be eaten by the cats and dogs, and have it’s eggs eaten by rats and stoats. This caused a massive crash in the population, and from 100,000′s in the 19th Century down to the 50 or so in 1995 this glorious bird face complete extinction.

Something had to be done, and in what is one of the best examples of conservation in the 20th century the New Zealand government and conservation groups swung into action, cleared two islands off the south coast of all predators, and relocated all the Kakapo they could find onto Cod Fish Island. The whole tale can be found on their website, and as a triumphal as the resurgence of the species has been there is still a lot more that needs doing before the Kakapo can be removed from the critical list.

Personally I am a sucker for a species with charm and charisma, and these birds have it in spadefuls. Their colourful fathers and cheeky personalities combine to make a package that is worthy of our attention. The kakapo deserves it’s second chance, and hopefully the conservation efforts will continue long term. Plus, if you fancy volunteering to look after them the details are on the website.

Posted in Social issues, environment | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Christine

Christine from Phil Inkelberghe on Vimeo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bedrock of society

If marriage between one man and one woman is the bedrock of society, then why are the divorce rates now over 50%? In both the USA and Britain the chances of you getting divorced have sky rocketed in the last twenty years, during which time we have seen an increased push by the right wing to suppress the rights of those who wish to marry someone of the same gender as themselves. If marriage is that sacred, that virtuous then why do so many men and women feel the need to get their marriage contract annulled by the courts? The answer lies somewhere between the recognition that relationships are never straight forward, and that ending a bad relationship is in the best interests of both parties, rather than clinging to a marriage which does both parties, and potentially any children harm. Divorce is not cheap, never straight forward, and tears at the fabric of the human heart. If this is true why do people put themselves through the roller coaster of love, relationships, and in the end marriage?

In Islam, especially the Shia strand of the faith, marriage is solely a contract between two people like any other, and from the perspective of a society that only allows sexual intercourse between married couple it makes some sort of logical sense to allow time fixed marriages which are concluded at the end of the contract – very useful if one wants to sleep with a prostitute without fear of being stoned to death as an adulterer. so as the old saying goes ‘when in Tehran…’ Marriage makes sense from this angle because of the punitive punishments levelled at those who break the laws concerning sex. Indeed Iran is one of the very few Islamic countries who allow full female rights for post operative transgendered women because their interpretation of the Koran sees these women as wholly female, and thus they are subjugated under the law as any other woman. They are able to be married as any other woman, and from the perspective of the state they are treated the same way as genetic females; kind of makes a mockery of the Texan ideal of marriage.

In the west we have developed a far more liberal minded approach to sex and intimacy in general, which has meant that there is not the over riding pell mell rush to get to the alter in order to scratch that itch. It would be fallacious to argue that western societies have been sexually virtuous prior to the liberalisation of the various laws governing intercourse and marriage, for there are many famous tales of courtesans, prostitutes, and the punters who frequent them in English and French literature – I would even hazard a guess that if you look closely enough there is probably a hieroglyphic somewhere in Egypt re-enacting the same tales. Once we escaped the cloying clutches of the church European society in particular was able to take a more lez-e-faire approach to conjugal relations, which meant that the stigma of the bastard and unwedded mothers has become a lot less. Yes single mothers in Britain get a lot of stick, and by that I mean tabloid howls of derision when the state deigns to help support their children, but at the same time these women are rarely seen to complain about their lot in life – and not just because of the fact they have free housing and benefits. Marriage to them is a dream, a bit like being a fairy princess is, nice in theory but very messy and tangled in practice. They do not need a father figure to help raise their children, and while both in theory and in practice it probably would be good to have the man stick around to help, there have now been two generations of families who have grown up over the last thirty years where marriage has not been an essential part of the family structure. Judge this how you will, but from the stand point of the historical marriage ideal this is about as far removed as it could possibly be.

Before anyone screams at their monitor and states that marriage has always be this nice rosy nostalgic concept historically, up until the mid-19th century nuptials were always seen as a contract between a man and a woman, and more importantly as a symbol of the male possession of women as part of their property. Now I am not getting all feminist on anyone’s arse, but truth be told I rather like the fact that women are able to have a choice about sex, marriage, partners, even something as simple as having credit in her own name. The modern idea of marriage being about love is a product of industrialisation, secularisation, and the acceptance that patriarchal social ownership is not the best way for a modern society to move forward. Amour has trumped the chattels, and in this fact we all should be very thankful. To be able to marry for love is a right we cherish and hold very dear to our hearts in the West, and while a lot of Asian cultures still use arranged marriages with all their benefits and pitfalls we always seem to view this idea with a major degree of discomfort, primarily because we like the freedom of choice and expression. Hands up anyone who feels totally comfortable with the idea that their parents will arrange a legally binding marriage between themselves and a distant relative or stranger?

So how does these concepts effect the idea of marriage for all, not just a man to a woman? If love is the foundation of modern western marriage and relationships, not the idea of ownership and the freedom to have intercourse, then why should we ban two people of the same gender from marrying? If society does not frown on pre-martial sex, and detests the idea that a man actually owns his wife, what possible reason is there to actually bar everyone from being able to obtain a marriage license, and it’s associated rights, to marry whomever they please? In the end we can make consenting love to whom we like without fear of arrest, everyone can obtain credit without the need for anyone else’s signature, and you can raise children without the need of another person’s approval or disapproval. Ultimately if marriage means anything in the 21st century it is about two people’s love for one another, and the choices they are able to make as a couple. Forget the flimflam, and accept that only a universal idea of amorous love provides any relative bedrock for the modern social institution we call marriage.

Posted in LGBT, Social issues | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Mark Salling in teen vogue

Personally I like his down to earth approach, and as he is now on Twitter he is definitely worth following.

Posted in Artist spotlight, Creativity, Interviews, Music, music | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mark Webber – zero to hero

To anyone who likes Formula One the name Mark Webber conjured up thoughts of a maverick, intelligent, hot headed driver who has both the raw speed of his compatriot world champion Alan Jones, and the drive of Ayton Senna. He is a driver who has grabbed the sport by the scruff of the neck from his first drive with Minardi in 2002, and though his time with Jaguar, Williams, and Red Bull has been beset with both mis-fortune and a sense he is going against the rub of the green. Up until the 2009 season there as a sense that his was a talent that has been thwarted, and even then with the arrival of Sebastian Vettel from Torro Rosso he has seen the team built around him and David Coulthard transform into the Seb show – just check out a four pack of Red Bull to see which driver is missing, and give you a hint it’s not Seb.

The reason I feel he is a hero, and is a major inspiration is not just his sheer bloody mindedness, rather the fact his is a driver who never knows when to give up, when to give in, or when to let go – most often for the better, but occasionally for the worst. He is also a damn fine guy to boot. His biography reads like a boys own adventure, and just to add a bit of spice to the mix in 2009 he thought he would give everyone a fair chance and drive with metal work still in his leg due to a bike accident. To be fair it probably wrecked his chances of being world champion in 2009, but in 2010, as of today, he currently leads the standings. Even if he does not win this year he has still shown that he has major cojones.

All joking aside I thorough recommend you check his profile out, and if possible read his BBC opinions as well, as he is always very forthright. In the end his is a very interesting, and in many ways inspiring story, and if anyone deserves to be world champion out of the current crop of drivers personally I believe Mark is that man.

Posted in Sport | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment